|
|
|
|
|
by mynameisvlad
1272 days ago
|
|
It’s clearly a hobby project, which means leeway is much more allowed. Furthermore, who are you to tell someone what is required, especially when you’re not paying or even using their service. Additionally, the existing privacy policy is a real policy. Just because it was generated doesn’t mean it’s not applicable. Not every policy needs to be handcrafted with love. What, exactly, is wrong with the current policy? Have you even read it? Finally, what exactly is the purpose of your comment? You may think it’s required, and that’s great, but so what? What does that change? Even remotely? Is the author going to get in a Time Machine and go back to before they created their project to make sure a Privacy Policy is the first thing they make? No. Once again, it’s on the list, the author will appease you eventually. Until then, don’t use the service. Problem solved. |
|
I'm sorry, but what sort of bullshit is that ?
The law does not differentiate between "hobby project" or not.
It would be the ultimate get-out clause for criminals ... "yes, officer, I'm distributing cocaine, but don't worry, its only a hobby project".