[headsoup]

Curiously they mostly stopped reporting on that this year.

Below 50's were never even close to high risk and as soon as it was known (which was very) the vaccines didn't prevent spread they should have immediately been halted for all low risk age groups.

[chezelenkoooo]

Did you try googling?

The chance of death is low for those up to 50. But vaccines even further reduce that.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.scientificamerican.com/arti...

Here's another one with a bit more of a specific breakdown

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/...

[headsoup]

Ooh yes, googling, the way to get the true and correct data first time, every time.

Unfortunately at this point there is no way to see if the vaccines have actually saved lives because a) they don't stop the virus or its spread, it is not confirmed that the vaccines haven't caused significantly more covid infections by being leaky (look up 'Leaky Vaccines,'[1] or OAS (original antigenic sin)) and they have encouraged high risk behaviour in the false belief the vaccines provide sufficient protection. I mean I don't even see any ads or posters around any more advising on hygiene improvements like not shaking hands, getting out in the sun, eating healthily, look after the weak and elderly, etc. People just take the vaccine as their safety blanket and worse, are signing their kids up for it when they were never a risk vector (until mid-covid the 'science' changed on that).

If you can point me to a study that conclusively shows vaccines absolutely saved lives over the longer term (that aren't based on models full of positive assumptions on efficacy and effectiveness), I'm happy to read it.

[1] example: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/theres-something-antigeni...