|
|
|
|
|
|
by prmph
1276 days ago
|
|
|
I think you’re having a pretty narrow understanding of the word “manager”. All your argument ms boils down to an inability to perceive that I’m using the word manager in a general sense, as someone who manages technical developments. I’m not referring to a political manager. Indeed if the only value added by a manger is to play politics, then I’m not sure whether the word manager should even apply to such a person. How a good day, and best wishes with your “management” style. |
|
|
The reason we're looking for a manager is that there isn't one, but the show must go on. One of those 3 teams was managed solely by me after it was created to build a new integration with a 3rd party vendor.
Once that integration went live someone on the business side sent out an email to everyone in the company and said they had never seen a project go so smoothly in the multiple years they had been there.
Yet here you are, unable to even _FATHOM_ such a thing working successfully.
What makes it worse is that Joel Spoelsky was talking about this in the late 90's, early 2000's, it's what made me originally start thinking about it. This aint new.