|
|
|
|
|
by prng2021
1272 days ago
|
|
The better option would have been to hire him. How is that not obvious? Amazon as a multi-national, multi-billion dollar company can absorb the expense of employing him. I’m the worst case, they can lay off an existing low performing employee to compensate. |
|
That is a very charitable opinion. The idea that because a company is large enough, or profitable enough, that it therefore should be compelled to hire indefinitely, or never shrink in size.
Let me ask, is it your opinion that economies only ever grow forward, that companies in the economy never shrink?