|
|
|
|
|
by hannofcart
1280 days ago
|
|
I think the article implicitly assumes an American context. Political arguments in other countries are not as contentious. American politics, as seen by someone who's never visited America but is hooked to the spectacle is fundamentally a difference in opinion about the reality we inhabit. In other countries, political arguments are not as contentious because we can broadly agree on the state of reality. I might think my local MP is corrupt and is better replaced by another while my uncle who lives nearby might think he might be a bit corrupt but more "effective" at "getting things done" than the other guy. Therefore, political arguments of this sort might render the dinner table conversation lively but never descend into acrimony. It's an entirely different thing if the starting point is that one of us thinks that the party the other one supports is filled with satanic vampires that murder children and drink their blood. To an outsider American politics is like a slow moving train wreck. It's horrifying but you just can't look away. |
|
Trying to look away from American politics suffers a similar problem.
(I once asked a farmer in a remote mountain village what her goats were named; the answer was: Hilary, George, and Barack)