|
|
|
|
|
by numair
1276 days ago
|
|
Oh man, where do we even begin. $1.5B would be a great number if it's true. The fact that the commenter compares that amount to the $300M they claim Netflix spends each year shows that they ... are ... a lot less intelligent than they probably think they are. Twitter: Billions of little updates that invalidate billions of cached data sets, every single day, that need to be analyzed and delivered very quickly. Netflix: Maybe millions of static files that do not ever change, that need to be shuttled to the closest CDN peer and cross referenced against profile and billing data before allowing access. How does anyone even begin to compare these two engineering tasks and think they have anything in common? ... And, looking at their timeline, they then went on to compare Twitter's infra to WhatsApp in the 2010s, when it did nothing other than store-and-forward over an Erlang bus! And thinks this infra has something in common with what it takes to run Twitter! What! I guess it shouldn't surprise me that a false expert with such a mediocre grasp of the realities of social infrastructure would be a major Elon fanboy. |
|