|
|
|
|
|
by anakaine
1279 days ago
|
|
Who said anything about profit? Not everything that exists to be solved, and for which their is a demand is driven by profit. Think: regulation, environmental, NGO, citizen science, academia, government agency, public service. All places where systems can exist that are not for profit, but do grant significant capabilities to their user base. Also, it's a particularly arrogant point of view to assume that because you cannot see a reason for something to exist that its development is invalid both now and into the future. You've also assumed the data is user defined. I can also guarantee you that user concurrency is not an issue after some recent load testing, with load capabilities surpassing expected user requests by several orders of magnitude whilst on minimum hardware. |
|
Maybe it is arrogant. That entirely depends on whether or not a product or service uses this specific approach -- successfully. Do you have an example?
Edit: I also want to clarify that my comment doesn't suggest that the underlying technology is bad or without use cases; only that it isn't suited for remote (online) processing. It would be way cheaper to manipulate data like that locally.