|
|
|
|
|
by kevincox
1277 days ago
|
|
Yeah, I see RSS and newsletters as largely equivalent technologies. The have minor technical differences but 99% of the read differences are social. Pro Feeds: 1. Once you subscribe the publisher has no way to contact you. Email relies on the publisher being honest. 2. Provides some history (or full history with archiving/pagination atom extensions) Pro Newsletter: 3. Push based system by default (Feeds can use WebSub but it isn't that common). 4. ~everyone already has it set up. At the end of the day they both transmit blobs of HTML to you with some minimal metadata. |
|