| Not quite. Here is my thinking, can’t be too elaborate because I’m typing on a phone keyboard, but here it is: We live in the age of information. The amount of information out there is limitless. This being the case, the importance lies in how a human being interfaces with this vast amount of information and which information out of the vast ocean of information is presented. Therefore curation is important. User experience is important. Discernment of what is actually valuable for a human being is also important. And how the user interacts with it is also important. Chatgpt is one form of crafting this user interface/experience. There are other ways to go about it. The feel of the interface itself, how it presents itself to the human, and what exactly it presents are all key. This is very different than say, an encyclopedia in which there is no discernment/bias of what is actually important for a human to know + very bad ui/ux. And also, most importantly, a human will die. An ai model will not. A human can only speak to one person at a time. An ai model could speak to countless. |
"Information" in the current sense (stats, news, (inter)national "politics") is a commodity that's being generated by the boatloads. Just because there's lots of it doesn't mean it's valuable in the sense that it actually pertains to you and your life.
So from my perspective you have the right ideas but wanting to satiate others with "information" is a bottomless pit (again, by design).
The information that is actually actionable is still right in front of us (at least in the west): it's local media (newspapers, radio, not TV). The slow, boring, local, tedious stuff. Apart from that it happens in associations, sport clubs, regional politics, NGO's.
For that, you don't need an AI.
Just fyi: I'm a doomscroller and news junkie so I'm not in a position to judge you. :)