|
|
|
|
|
|
by kylevedder
1280 days ago
|
|
|
Humans give explanations that other humans find convincing, but they can be totally wrong and non-causal. I think human explanations are often mechanistically wrong / totally acausal. As a famous early example, this lady provided an unprompted explanation (using only the information available to her conscious part of her brain in her good eye) for some of her preferences despite the mechanism of action being subconscious observations out of her blind eye. https://www.nature.com/articles/336766a0 |
|
|