|
|
|
|
|
by RajT88
1275 days ago
|
|
> The fact that non-human animals live an existence of violent survival does not seem to be prima facie evidence for the nonexistence or incoherence of human morality. You missed the point. Morality is a human invention, much like computers are (albeit philosophical, not physical in nature). Like computers, it didn't exist before consciousness evolved. Talking about morality as a universal truth, and there being some invisible scales of justice which will eventually even out is thusly irrational. |
|
But I wouldn't concede that morality is a human invention like the computer. That would imply that it's accidental and not grounded in anything fundamental to our species or nature's laws.
Do you believe that choosing to feed your kids, or choosing to not kill someone are simply created constructs like the computer or the airplane?
Also, I think these two statements can be true at the same time: (1) The Moral Law is real and exists outside of our subjective experience and historical cultural evolution and (2) concepts like Karma are without evidence.