|
|
|
|
|
by MrOwnPut
1281 days ago
|
|
They own part of the company that is worth that much. They can't liquidate all their assets without harming the company, thus the livelihoods of their employees. Look at what they create, not only what they are worth. Also your charity endeavors are more effective with the compound interest of a billionaire vs a multi-millionaire. |
|
Don’t get me wrong, I think in growth stages, stock exchanges do allocate money to fuel productive sectors of society. But during other periods of a company’s life, they are mere zero sum games, where money goes mostly from retail investors to enrich hedge funds.
I think the problem is that there is no limit to shareholder value extraction. The non-productive sector of society parks their money in shares in order to legally plunder the value exchange of producers and consumers.
Now that we have utility tokens, the network can be owned by the participants. Raise money by selling utility tokens at a discount. They have a ceiling after all (the value of the utility token) and you can only sell as much as people believe there will be demand in the end from actual customers.
You can raise money by selling shares temporarily but have the shares be usable as discounts on utility tokens so you can sell them to customers. And that way you can ignore your shareholders clamoring for you to cannibalize your ecosystem for them.