|
|
|
|
|
by oreally
1277 days ago
|
|
The thesis was an investigation into whether the super-rich are better at making money, but they just took widely known distributions to tell a story enforcing that view without diving in as to why that's the case. It's the classic case of using statistics as a method to divert blame onto something else. You learn nothing but a sense of despair from these kinds of analysis. |
|