|
|
|
|
|
by busyant
1272 days ago
|
|
> she may not have understood what an actual expert was. There is a legal "standard" around the admissibility of expert testimony (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard). The person who got me to testify told me he made around $700 K per year. He drove a ~$200K Maybach so I had no reason to doubt him. I also met a plaintiff's lawyer who told me, roughly, "If the lawsuit ever sees a jury, the jury never understands the science. It's all about likeability and looking good. I had a juror tell me, 'I picked your side because you had a really nice tie.' So, I always wear a nice tie!" That was probably a hyperbolic story, but I'm sure there's a lot of truth to it, too. |
|