|
|
|
|
|
|
by somenewaccount1
1274 days ago
|
|
|
No, it's not. One actually has a valid business with flawed implementation which effected a portion of customers. The other is a Ponzi scheme that stole 100% of assets from 100% of customers. In Wells case, affected customers have legal recourse that can compensate them for their suffering, because the overall business is solvent. In FTX case, you get nothing, nada, zero, zip. |
|
|