|
|
|
|
|
by tomxor
1274 days ago
|
|
> the renters make horrible financial decisions that set them up to work until they die. Did you read the article? Genuine question. Because you seem to be completely missing the main point it's making, it's not exactly lacking in examples. |
|
TFA says amortized cost of things is lower when you have access to cash, or cheap credit. Buying in bulk in large shops is cheaper than buying small amounts at local shops. Proper renting is cheaper than weekly-billed accomodation.
But then GP is saying, the poor often have better access to credit than it might seem, it just goes to things that don't improve their financial situation. Nice cars and jewelry for instance.
I don't really know and suspect both are true to an extent, but chipping in since poverty is fascinating to me and I don't fully understand it (I come from and remain in a modest background btw). Sometimes it's just a lack of cash but often it seems not as simple as that.