[than3]

Well that characterization is a bit farfetched, but not completely.

You would have to equate "em surveillance" with all radio (that is em after all), and coverage of course varies by location.

As for inner speech and bodily actions that does go too far because its much simpler, and has little to do with the other.

They use a combination of psychological blindspots, mass media, and indoctrination to influence the latter. It could be as simple as a sound that previously was associated with a dopamine hit, or other conditioned response. Cialdini wrote a book on the subject covering the most common blindspots.

As for the rest, that's a bit off the rails sir.