[spritefs]

Also something to note is that the focus of the article is preventative as opposed to creating new outlets. Just because reuters is there doesn't mean everyone will read it, but a good number of people could see content that's not as reputable

> If Twitter is full of bots and misinformation, then there’s value in being a small mastadon instance of hand curated friends where you can trust everyone.

I agree with this, but the way that we use the internet and media might not be the way that most people use it. If the focus is preventative, I have no idea how curation could scale in a way that prevents bad actors from reaching an audience, just because there's so much stuff to curate