|
|
|
|
|
by 411111111111111
1272 days ago
|
|
Its completely fine if you wish to treat your repository like that, but that doesn't make this treatment the only viable and correct way. There are a lot of people which include their helm package as part of their project repository and even more that generate the changelog from standardized git messages like conventional commits and still wish to persist them in a changelog.md inside of the repository to make completely banal examples spelled out to the letter. It works well and lets you scale these things pretty well inside of a corporation with a lot of teams. Its completely fine to keep all that out of your automated pipeline, triggering only after these things have occured... but that's not the only viable choice a developer can make and you're very much talking from of an extremely limited perspective if thats your point of view. |
|