|
|
|
|
|
by hbrn
1275 days ago
|
|
> most common reason for using static typing is to allow the codebase to be a monolith like it's still the 90s This is so true. Static typing shines when you have a very complicated deeply nested system. And that's what most teams are naturally end up creating. But how about not building the complicated system in the first place? Most of complexity in modern software is accidental. |
|
"For every complex problem, there's a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong."