[vidarh]

I find it interesting that most attempts to support Google in this instances uses far more extreme examples to justify it.

I don't think anyone is insisting that there are no types of images that are so bad that it wouldn't be ok for Google to remove them. At least I haven't seen anyone claim so.

As long as that is the case, using examples that the vast majority would agree are worse than the one that was actually taken down just weakens your point dramatically.

[megablast]

By using extreme examples, people show that obviously there is a line. Most people agree some photos should be banned, after this point is made.

Now we are just arguing about where the line is.