[anyfactor]

Solid question. There are a ton of reasons why accurate geolocation matters for everyone. For us it matters, because that is what we do as a business, we provide super accurate data.

> I don't want random website owners to know exactly where I am.

With IP geolocation, it is not exactly "exact" location. City level? Yes. Zip code level? Kinda Yes. Latitude and Longitude? I would put it as a good possible estimation. Our customers are aware of that.

Nobody is tracking you with IP geolocation, to be honest. It is used for a ton of reason.....and I just had a long day, please just read the blogs we have on our site. I wrote some of the blogs myself.

> Why should it mean a lot to me?

Honestly, if you are not being impacted by wrong IP geolocation, it may not mean a lot to you personally. But people who are impacted are being located to a wrong city, state or in some cases to a different country. Us providing accurate geolocation does mean a lot in my opinion. There are no hoops to jump through, we are literally reaching out to you to find a way to solve this problem.

[LeifCarrotson]

> It is used for a ton of reason.....and I just had a long day, please just read the blogs we have on our site. I wrote some of the blogs myself.

I scrolled through and found eg. https://ipinfo.io/blog/using-privacy-detection-data/ and https://ipinfo.io/blog/privacy-adtech-online-targeting/ and https://ipinfo.io/blog/governments-ip-address-data/, but while these might be useful to me as a business to filter the zip codes of targeted ads, they're exactly the opposite of something that provides value to me as a user.

Accurate geolocation might reduce the number of nuisance captchas I have to complete. You write "Our data is also used by governments around the globe because they know they can trust the insights we offer. Every day our databases are updated with the most accurate information at any given time..." but while your databases are the most accurate available, they're not 100% accurate, they're IMO conflating IP with identity and physical location and that just doesn't make sense.

[anyfactor]

Thank you. It is good to have these conversations. I appreciate you for taking a look. You are right, organizations should not conflate IP with identity on an absolute scale.

We are very open about the fact that, with IP geolocation, absolute real-time accuracy is not possible. There are billions of IP addresses and thousands of IP address owners who are shuffling them around randomly. Getting readily updated absolute accurate real-time data is damn near impossible at our scale. The most updated data you can get is on a daily basis, and we process around 1.3 billion requests per day.

The alternative you have to IP geolocation is GPS based geolocation. GPS has its place when used properly. IP geolocation is essentially a database. We are not getting any information from the user or their movement. We are largely inferring the data based on various publicly available datasets combined with an incredible amount of analysis.

The accuracy of our database on the city level is pretty close to 100%, but it is not 100%. This level of accuracy is acceptable to our customers. But you are right. There is a non-zero chance of error.

Now, customers who buy our product have to determine what is the significance of this of error rate. In most cases of IP geolocation, that is acceptable. Imagine traffic data at enterprise scale. Some of these organization are actively fighting cyberattacks on a minute to minute level. So, our data is very helpful for them. It is helpful in providing location context in data enrichment processes.

For advertisement and personalization, this low error rate could have significant impact. That is why we are having this conversation here, because some naively constructed personalization solution forces geolocation attributes on users.

But what we are seeing here is, GPS based location solutions, believing that they are so damn accurate whatever decision these organizations are making is not their fault, it is the user's fault somehow! Which is freaking absurd.

IP location's reasonable accuracy makes a strong case for privacy. There is no tracking involved for a user. For the regular organization with IP geolocation, they have just enough data on the user, and they are not asking the user to agree to a location tracking solution.

If organizations chose IP based location, they would be more lenient in providing easier fixes to personalization, because they are aware of the fact of non-zero chance of error rate. I am not trying to market the fact that not providing absolutely accurate data is a selling point somehow, but in fact I am trying to advocate for organizations to be more accepting and supportive of user requests. Most of the people I interact with about IP correction are not our customers or users of our customers. But we want to make sure they don't face these issues when they use our data or when they interact with someone who is using our data.