|
|
|
|
|
|
by thewinnie
1277 days ago
|
|
|
Can you please add some proofs for all your statements? As a person who been living in Crimea for big part of my live I do find your comment very disconnected from reality. From strategist perspective Crimea does not have anything to give to Russia except logistics problems and few military bases. Ukraine has way more claims for Crimea rather than Russia. If we gonna use your logic than Russia should give back to Ukraine Kuban oblast (which for long time were part of the USSR) Crimea had its own parliament but saying it was independent its an open lie. Crimea belong to crimean tatars. Which been deported from Crimea during Stalin genocide. But if we go with your logic, crimean tatars should be the one who are the real "owners" of the Crimea, and they are pro-Ukrainane. Simply cause russia to this day killing and torturing them. Nothing with Crimea occupation is unique. Dictatorship government occupy new territory, silencing and do genocide so then it will be easy to fake referendums. |
|
|
I don't really understand your point about real "owners". Crimea today is de facto Russia and de jure Ukraine on the basis of the 1994 agreement (I think we can safely ignore the 9 countries which accepted the results of the 2014 referendum). Their unique situation regarding the rest of Ukraine is that they have been at odd with the federation more often than not and have consistently voted for pro-Russian politicians to the point that Ukraine had to military removes their government once. It is very different from what's happening in the other invaded provinces.