|
|
|
|
|
by TillE
1275 days ago
|
|
"Cross-posting" is generally understood to mean posting the same content to different sites, not merely linking to a post. The policy is...not at all clear. I don't know what they mean by posting content "from" a prohibited site. They don't specifically mention a link. |
|
> "In general, "
That's all you need to know. Those two words imply "but for -specific cases- there are other criteria".
Looking at the positive side: Now you get to police yourself and/or get to know yourself: will you bend your will to yet another digital tyrant and self-police your self-expression? Will every time you are ready to press that "send" button on a post with links give you pause, thinking "I think, "in general", I am toeing the line, o Supreme Leader, please please let me stay. Monetize me, do with me as you will, but please, just let me tweet!"
We're making a society of digital sheep, "are you in?"
p.s. all these efforts by various tech giants, including those who hold your 'email address' hostage such as Alphabet, are infringing on your digital identity, which they believe they own and control.
And without a durable independent identity, who are you in digital "society"? How could there ever be "democracy" in a "digital society" when people can be erased just like that?