Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by _kbh_ 1279 days ago
this is a myth perpetrated by Elon to justify his banning of twitter account, there is nothing private about tail information, in fact it is required to be publicly available.
3 comments

Genuine question, IANAL: how is this different from car registration plates, which Google blurs out to avoid this kind of problem for normal people? Ditto all the data protection issues about ANPR systems.

(This isn't to defended Musk, quite the contrary given he tweeted a number plate).

Registration plates aren't already tracked and made available publicly wherever they are. Planes are.
Many aircraft, particularly those flying IFR, are required by law in many jurisdictions to broadcast their location to reduce the risk of collisions and facilitate air traffic control. Check aviation transponder interrogation modes and ADS-B in particular
how is this different from car registration plates, which Google blurs out to avoid this kind of problem for normal people?

Google chooses to blur it. I don't think they're legally obligated to.

it's an interesting question actually.

we track planes for safety reasons. when a plane disappear from the radar, it's a big deal. an educated guess why cars aren't tracked is privacy and there are too many.

but in a world where cars are going to be electric, these problems might go away.

Subreddits were banned for collecting publicly available on information in a single post. There used to be a subreddit documenting lives of Google CxOs, it didn't last one week.
I would have agreed and recently made the same argument on HN re the Twitter bans.

What I’ve since learned however is that tracking his jet requires a combination of public and private information. He’s part of a privacy scheme which routinely changes the plane’s identifier: https://mobile.twitter.com/DavidSacks/status/160385752457453...

At that point, I think the argument that it’s doxxing is justified to some extent.

> What I’ve since learned however is that tracking his jet requires a combination of public and private information. He’s part of a privacy scheme which routinely changes the plane’s identifier: https://mobile.twitter.com/DavidSacks/status/160385752457453...

My understanding is that he _stopped_ using this service and now his plane broadcasts the same tail number all the time.

If that’s true then it’s not doxxing at all and fair game.

Ultimately planes are tracked and the information made public. If you’re concerned about privacy, travel by different means.

> My understanding is that he _stopped_ using this service and now his plane broadcasts the same tail number all the time.

Where is your understanding coming from?

Elon Musk himself confirmed 2 days ago that he is using that privacy scheme: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603803508087537665

I got it from here.

> https://twitter.com/AricToler/status/1603802439232241665

It looks like he might be enrolled but not actively using it, or using it wrong according to the above tweet.