Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by TobTobXX 1287 days ago
I'd suggest you read their ToS[0], specifically section 2.1(.2). It shows that they'd really like you to make all content public. To guarantee that publicity, they rake care of the listing. There is (currently?) no option for unlisted repos. just either public or private. And by the observing the way they think about privare repos, you can form an idea about how they'd think about unlisted repos.

[0]: https://codeberg.org/codeberg/org/src/TermsOfUse.md

1 comments

I've read that. It doesn't say or even suggest anything like what we're actually talking about here. Someone pointing to those terms in the TOS is either confused about what this discussion is about, confused about what exactly the TOS is addressing, or both.