[maxbond]

I hear a lot of people talking about the Fediverse of many different technical backgrounds. It's true it would take a huge event to get non-technical people interested in the Fediverse - but that's exactly what I'm seeing.

They're not a solution in search of a problem. They're a solution a small, dedicated group of people have cared deeply about, but most people have ignored. But people have been unsatisfied with the centralized aspects of social media for a long time. They're not stupid; they see the way the algorithms are designed for engagement, and the toxicity that causes. They see how fragile it is that someone like Musk can just swoop in and sabotage the platform.

Network effects have made it difficult to adopt a decentralized solution. Well - lots of communities are looking for a home they won't have to leave for the same reason they did before. That's creating network effects in the opposite direction.

If you'd said this to me a few weeks ago I'd have been inclined to believe it. But things are in flux. Maybe the Fediverse won't take off, but it has a very really shot right now.

[TomSwirly]

I simply don't get the problem with the "Fediverse". Mastodon works very much like Twitter and you can follow people on your server or another one with ease. You don't need to know anything about anything to do this.

[drstewart]

Go ask your mom what algorithm she prefers for her content feed and report back.

[defrost]

Meh, she seems happy following other emeritus professors on mathstodon.xyz and crafty types in weaving and bridge groups.

How about your mom?

[drstewart]

Like yours, she doesn't give a damn about the algorithm and thus isn't on Mastodon for that reason.

[defrost]

That's rather unlike my mother who is on a Mastodon instance and has a long and documented love of algorithms.