|
|
|
|
|
by subLimb
5286 days ago
|
|
Maybe technically, but the word doesn't really add anything to the statement if someone uses it anytime they didn't observe what happened. Supposedly is akin to saying "Assuming what this person said is true, ..." which in many cases implies doubt (why not just say "so and so said she went into town"). I think his point was that it makes literal sense, but it doesn't help the process of communication, which is why he's torn on the issue. |
|
I think it does help - it implies that there is doubt (and possibly some lying involved with what's going on).
Simply stating "so and so said she went into town" is factual (although emphasizing "said" can also imply the same things that using "supposedly" does).
However, if the top-level-commenter's GF is using "supposedly" not in this way, I'd agree that'd be annoying. Maybe she's the mistrustful sort?