| > A bulldozer destroys the park and other people's ability to enjoy it hear hear... > Passively training a model on an artwork does not change the art in the slightest copyright holders, I mean individual authors, people who actually produced the content being used, disagree. They say AI is like a bulldozer destroying the park to them. Which technically is true, it's a machine that someone (some interested party maybe?) is trying to disguise as a human, doing human stuff. But it's not. > passive, non-destructive Passive, non-destructive, in this context means - passive: people send the images to you, you don't go looking for them - non-destructive: people authorized you, otherwise it's destructive of their rights. |