|
|
|
|
|
by simne
1279 days ago
|
|
> ITER is fundamentally unable to replicate the conditions that materials will be subjected to in an actual commercial fusion reactor Are You joking? Or You just don't know physics? What REALLY differ ITER (DEMO) from real commercial reactor? |
|
ITER fails in at least two ways. First, the intensity of neutron radiation at the first wall is far too low for a viable commercial reactor. It cannot simulate the heat load a commercially viable breeding module would encounter. Second, ITER cannot operate for more than a few weeks, so it cannot simulate the integrated radiation load a commercial first wall would have to be able to withstand. It also cannot operate with enough blanket modules, for long enough, to move the designs down experience curves for reliability growth to occur so they are sufficiently robust for a commercial reactor (this is a huge looming problem, as they will be very difficult to repair.)
Abdou at UCLA has been beating the drum for a FNSF to actually address these issues. He's been beating this drum for DECADES.