|
|
|
|
|
by viraptor
1285 days ago
|
|
> it's not obvious that federated social networking can reliably deliver that Why not? It's federated, not isolated. If enough people are available to achieve the network effects you're after, what would you lack?
(Content discovery solutions are already being created for people who want to play with them) > It seems like there's an audience for a tool that leverages the Twitter API to scrape your following/follower data into a convenient format and perhaps automate the business of finding and reconnecting with those people on another platform. https://twitodon.com/ for mastodon already exists > If 'science twitter' decamps to 'science.social' it could quickly find itself effectively cut off from its public Why? What's different from frontend social, infosec exchange, etc.? In the general population is mastodon, I can't imagine science twitter being called out as woke. |
|