|
|
|
|
|
by impossiblefork
1293 days ago
|
|
If you're representing people whose property rights have been infringed you can't agree that some of those people are to have to give up their property rights-- then you aren't representing them any more, so you are no longer their legitimate representative. Framing in terms of a sacred right is strange, and it's possible that the project will fail, but the PLOs legitimacy for those it represents must obviously hinge on actually representing them. I very strongly dislike Islam, but to say that Israel has done as it has due to the Muslims seems difficult to support, since Christian Palestinians do exist, even if they're few and have been treated in the precise same way as the Muslims despite their lack of association with terrorism etcetera. |
|