|
|
|
|
|
|
by pacifika
1288 days ago
|
|
|
As I see it, it generates fakes or potentially correct solutions that require review and alteration. So it’s best employed by a professional that can judge the generated result in a wider context. Not too different from interpreting lighthouse scores. It can make anyone with the means to access it a bad coder but the value of a professional has always been in picking the best solution from the possible ones. |
|
|
When you actually decide the best solution you list pros and cons, weigh risk and cost, etc. These are all easily automated through least cost optimization. Not even using AI.