| > This implies, no record of personal purchases around. What's stopping peoole to do it? I regularly pay my drinks cash. I never paid a beer more than 10k though... > The current "fight against cash" goes in direction of that risk. I'm glad that when I pay someone for something they can't say I didn't do it and ask for the money again. That includes the State. I paid my taxes, here's the proof. I already paid my energy bill, here's the statement from the bank, have a good day. Besides, what you are talking about has nothing to do with limits to cash transactions, I am honestly scared by the idea of going around with 10k in a bag to pay for something only a fool or a criminal would actually do it and feel comfortable about it. it's betting against bad luck and I an quite sure that I would not win. Are you sure that you are going to the appointment with the seller with 12k in cash and they are not showing up with guns and rob you? And what would you do then? Go to the police? that first thing will do is ask you why you were going around with that much cash in a bag. Thanks, but no thanks. |
Bad question. Good question instead: "What seems to be the trend which may be at some point stop people from doing it".
> what you are talking about
You do not get the point. Of course one is glad to have the ability to prove transactions that one wants to be recorded; the issue is with the threats to the ability of carrying on transactions that one does not want to be recorded.