|
|
|
|
|
|
by chii
1287 days ago
|
|
|
> Why is it better to actively facilitate the act of paying an assassin than it is to not do that? for assassinations, may be we currently all agree that it isn't good to allow it to happen. However, that is only just an extreme example, for which it is something most people would agree should be illegal. But what about other actions? Killing the ability to transact, regardless of the subject of a transaction, is detrimental to change, and entrenches existing powers/authority. These existing authority should not feel safe implementing new laws, if there are ways that could circumvent them. This makes the authority remain honest, and only implement laws that would have popular support. |
|
|
You have successfully convinced me that you’re either a parody account or GPT-4 in training. This is insane.