I seemed to never care until they took my sysvinit away (or maybe any decent init system :D). Then they took resolv.conf control away. Then when I shutdown my computer, some random process takes 1 min 30 seconds to shutdown when it probably doesn't need to. Then I read on hacker news recently that Fedora uses a systemd daemon for handling OOM and the writer said it was terribly misconfigured particularly when it shutdown his X session and all processes related to it when an OOM condition happened. I am not a Linux admin (or at least a sophisticated one so I can look smart with systemd), but now they are taking cron away too? :D
I kid about this, in a way, and I know I should accept the inevitable, but I feel like just moving to Devuan on my laptop and use a nice init system, like OpenRC :D
Cron requires manual locking, which results in an old service sometimes aborting without cleaning that up, and then refusing to start ever since.
I'm precisely in the middle of an update that's going to throw that out, and just change to a systemd service/timer. Then that problem will go away for good.
Funnily at my previous job once upon a time the cron daemon crashed for some obscure reason, so the default monitoring template for years afterwards included a check if the cron process is up and running.
This is exactly what happens, just like the old XKCD: Now there are N+1 competing standards.
It's why I have to check /etc/profile, ~/.profile, /etc/profile.d/*, ~/.bashrc (or whatever shell), /etc/environment, ~/.env, and a few others I don't even remember to figure out why an $ENVVAR is set.
I have to look at two cron-like things to figure out what's scheduled when. systemd-timers has been around and in use for a long while.
I kid about this, in a way, and I know I should accept the inevitable, but I feel like just moving to Devuan on my laptop and use a nice init system, like OpenRC :D