|
|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
1283 days ago
|
|
|
> It's accurate, right? No, because it carries a false implication. I'm failing to see that here for anyone who hasn't come to their conclusion ex ante. There seems to be a generalized dislike for anyone covering anything related to FTX without screaming that it was a fraud. We know it was a fraud. The people who don't think it's a fraud will never be convinced otherwise. |
|
|
IOW, exactly the criticism everyone is making about the article's framing of Ellison's history. We're back to square one.