Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tjoff 1287 days ago
Neat, very different results. But still looking at it from the wrong direction?

That is, ipv6 for clients. But I'm more interested in servers, because that is what would affect me if I don't have IPv4. Such as the experiences described by OP in this thread.
1 comments
noipv6 1287 days ago
ipv6-only web sites are borderline nonexistant, because no one who needs to maintain a profit dares to cut off a revenue stream from legacy ip only users (yet).

the most exhaustive list thus far is https://sites.ip-update.net/ afaik

link
tjoff 1287 days ago
I'm not asking for ipv6-only, but ipv4-only.

Those are the ones blocking adoption for me, as an end user.

link
keiyakins 1284 days ago
How are they blocking? You're just behind a NAT64, which is no worse than NAT44, with the bonus of having actual connectivity on the IPv6 side.
link
noipv6 1286 days ago
derp yes

https://whynoipv6.com/

link