|
|
|
|
|
|
by sgtnoodle
1283 days ago
|
|
|
Being a UART protocol, it seems like physical access is assumed. It's interesting as an asynchronous variant of g-code. Given the inherent safety implications, I think an improved protocol would benefit from some sort of checksum and feedback mechanism. Also, it seems perhaps a bit confusing to overload both position and velocity control using the same "l" code. |
|
|