[leashless]

Eh. I’m sorry, I know you feel like you’ve got relevant expertise here and you’re doing some kind of public service here fighting with those evil blockchain people.

But you’re out of your depth and making very week assertions to cover the gaps in your data.

If you want to NDA and talk directly to the sellers of the land about the commercials of the deal, that can probably be arranged. But your speculation is based on weak data not access to the facts, and is not really going to replace things like an independent valuation and the opinions of the experienced real estate lawyers who papered this deal.

Yes, it’s a novel way to buy land, but the underlying deal mechanics are pretty conservative. There is nothing up anybody’s sleeves, and we encourage full diligence from any prospective buyers - they’re going to need to bring their own legal counsel to assess the purchase mechanisms and the NFT binding arrangements anyway.

This is not some deal to retail: we expect the sale to be to a real estate developer.

I don’t think there’s anything else I can do to convince you of your error.

Thanks for your interest in our work.