[PebblesRox]

> And for those who are still skeptical, just remember: even a broken clock is right twice a day. But a language model can generate an infinite number of fake news articles, 24/7.

I'm tickled by this part and I'm trying to figure out why. Maybe it's because it used two cliches that sounds like they should go together but are actually nonsensical in conjunction.

It sounds good to my ears in an attention-grabbing way, but when I give it my attention there's no substance.

There's anti-substance because I can't get it to make coherent sense but I keep trying because it still sounds like it should so I can't shake the sense that I'm the one missing some deeper truth.

It's like the uncanny valley of logical reasoning.

It's not an optical illusion, it's a rhetorical illusion.