|
|
|
|
|
by lurker616
1287 days ago
|
|
I get a feeling that the twitter mob/vigilante journalism unleashed upon the FTX meltdown story may not entirely be accurate. Obviously something bad has happened financially, and people and emotional and angry. But we have to give our courts and the law system a chance. I don't want vigilante mobs condemning people to jail and death. We are literally hearing only one side of the story - maybe there is a 1% chance that the books were not cooked, that the rapid crypto crash combined with bad accounting practices (not fraud) did actually lead to losing billions of dollars. The very fact that SBF/caroline haven't been arrested leads me to think that the legal authorities see facts which we cannot see. There is an echo chamber forming that is - republican (people linking this meltdown to deep state conspiracy theories) - sexist (comments about caroline) - anti-semitic (comments about religion) and in the past, these mobs have been wrong in many cases. People are repeating theories as if they are facts, and that makes me uneasy. |
|
Which side of the story do you think is missing? SBF has been on a huge media tour.
> maybe there is a 1% chance that the books were not cooked, that the rapid crypto crash combined with bad accounting practices (not fraud) did actually lead to losing billions of dollars.
How do you factor in the alleged backdoor coded into FTX or the fact they hired someone who had previously helped cover up criminal activity as a regulatory/compliance officer?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/ftxs-regulatory-chief-4-job-tit...
https://www.pokernews.com/news/2013/05/audio-tapes-expose-ul...