Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by this_user 1287 days ago
> The point I disagree with (and I think the original post is making) is just because an unpopular group (WSB) is interested in something, doesn’t discredit it.

If that groups has consistently been wrong about everything for two years, then it absolutely does. It's like Jim Cramer: If he states something, there is at least a 90% chance that the opposite will happen.
2 comments
rcarr 1287 days ago
They’re at 60% of the float locked up with DRS now. Once they get to 100% then the true measure of whether they were right or wrong can be ascertained.
link
qwytw 1287 days ago
> there is at least a 90% chance that the opposite will happen.

That'd be cool. You could make a lot of money. Unfortunately he's probably closer to 50%.

link