|
|
|
|
|
by cmeacham98
1286 days ago
|
|
> Understand, though where exactly does ChatGPT claim to be a source of factual information? It doesn't right now, but if you scroll up, you'll see the idea at the beginning of this thread is to turn it into a source of information. The difference between ChatGPT and Wikipedia for this purpose is that: 1. Wikipedia is wrong wayyyyyyyy less often than ChatGPT 2. Wikipedia has sources linked at the bottom of the page you can go check, while ChatGPT does not |
|