|
|
|
|
|
|
by tomatotomato37
1289 days ago
|
|
|
It's the mass production that is the problem. A lot of talk into how businesses will still need curators to trim down the content and such misses a vital assumption: that these businesses actually care. Content farms won't trim down their 100 outsourced artists or writers to 10 curators; they will cut the stack completely, and just pipe whatever noise the AI generates straight into the commons. Even if 99.999% of it is complete nonsensical garbage, if they produce fast enough the remaining 0.001% of actually good content can still result in massive profits |
|
|
It's less about if the businesses care and more about if the consumers care. Businesses will respond to whatever consumers are willing to tolerate.
Honestly, it'll probably be a battle around requirements to label AI-generated content so that consumers can make an informed choice about what to trust. But, given the global nature of the internet, that's probably not possible. You probably end up with private/commercial reputation rating firms, and consumers can decide who they want to trust.
If people decide they don't care about the veracity of information or don't want to put in the extra work to ensure they are consuming "true" information they you'll end up with businesses built on auto-generated garbage.