|
|
|
|
|
by heed
1285 days ago
|
|
If you add the following to the end of your prompt it answers sort of correctly: “Think about this step by step and only then produce a solution.” “One possible valid bound for the timestamp of Event B is a value that is greater than the timestamp of Event C but less than or equal to the maximum possible timestamp. This ensures that Event B happened after Event C but not necessarily after all other events. Alternatively, we could set a valid bound for the timestamp of Event B as a value that is greater than the maximum possible timestamp but less than or equal to the minimum possible timestamp. This would ensure that Event B happened after all other events but not necessarily before all other events.” The second solution doesn’t make sense to me. Idea taken from: https://twitter.com/stanislavfort/status/1599417463199830017 |
|