[lemonlym]

Interesting case and I appreciate you raising the point. I definitely see what you mean, however, I could see the quality going from trying to spam a post with irrelevant content to spamming with relevant but incorrect content. Again though, you're right that many current systems do seem to work to a reasonable extent.

[ggm]

I'd go to what "karma" is providing. An indication at some level of inherent trust in what people reflect on what they see. The problem would of course be that if the bots start voting karma, then karma will inherently decline as a source of value.

I probably go to verified identity. Thats going to upset a lot of people who want pseudonymous posting to be underpinned by substantive anonymity behind it.

I think in the case of ChatBPT and GPT, I want the AI to have "Hologram" H tattoo on their foreheads for some time yet.