[wizeman]

No, because I'm not saying robots are human just because they're intelligent.

The analogy is more like: if robots can write like a human, then robots have the ability to write, and saying otherwise is just applying a double standard.

Similarly, if a robot can behave as intelligently as a human, then such a robot is intelligent and I don't see how anyone can argue otherwise without logical fallacies.

[skor]

ok, no argument from me on that.

but are we saying robots can behave intelligently as a human?

[wizeman]

> but are we saying robots can behave intelligently as a human?

I believe that ChatGPT can behave more intelligently than most humans at many important and useful tasks already.

I also believe that it behaves less intelligently than most humans at many tasks that are also important and useful.

For some other tasks, it behaves at more or less the same level as a human.

Moreover, I believe that the gaps between what models like ChatGPT can do and what a human can do are closing extremely rapidly.

[jiriro]

You ChatGPT? :)

[cvladan]

:)