|
|
|
|
|
by vidarh
5287 days ago
|
|
Even for the sake of argument assuming legislation is the right answer here: The problem with SOPA is not so much what can be done to stop "bad guys", but how it can be done, namely without a court order, and only based on "reasonable belief". It is massively chilling by virtue of causing large liabilities if someone don't act, even if/when they don't or even can't know for sure if the claim made is true, while granting immunity if they do act. It creates a de facto assumption of guilt by creating a strong incentive to act without evidence of any wrongdoing. |
|