|
|
|
|
|
by lumost
1301 days ago
|
|
If you are writing CPP, rust is a godsend. Many pitfalls/code review debates/wtf moments simply don’t happen in the language. There are huge cpp code bases in the wild which need help. However rust string handling is barely a step above c’s, there are a variety of datastructures c engineers dislike simply because of the memory management constraints. Getting 2x better performance than Java is a marginal gain for many environments. I really hope rust takes a bent towards ease of use. Stabilizing a rust gc arena would be hugely impactful, or simply revisiting the string api. |
|
> However rust string handling is barely a step above c’s
How so? Personally I've found it very good.